this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
584 points (90.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2559 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's an example of what can be done with 5 hours of storage. 5 hours is a 25% participation rate of V2G where the participants offer a third of their battery capacity.

https://reneweconomy.com.au/a-near-100pct-renewable-grid-for-australia-is-feasible-and-affordable-with-just-a-few-hours-of-storage/

If going with the (false) assumption that nuclear can hit 100% grid penetration, it would take decades to offset the carbon released by causing a single year of delay.

The lowest carbon "let's pretend storage is impossible and go with 100% nuclear" would still start with exclusively funding VRE.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol at trying to pass that link off as a valid, unbiased source.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol at a rando discrediting an article that gives supporting data. Did you even read it? Write your own well supported opinion and submit it here. We’ll wait.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh is that a new rule? You can't point out garbage, bias sources unless you've written a dissertation on it? Fucking rube.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. You are a garbage biased source.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great comeback. Very cute.

But why don't you go ahead and go get a juice box and let the adults speak.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

TIL an "adult" is someone who denigrates a link without even reading it or having any substantive data points to support their points. Sounds like you have plenty of juice boxes to give out.