260
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
260 points (97.4% liked)
Political Discussion and Commentary
1486 readers
189 users here now
A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!
The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.
Content Rules:
- Self posts preferred.
- Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
- No spam or self promotion.
- Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.
Commentary Rules
- Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
- Stay on topic.
- Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
- Provide credible sources whenever possible.
- Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
- Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
- Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).
Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.
Partnered Communities:
• Politics
• Science
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Spoiler: They won't change them.
The entire concept of a single number that you share with every employer and can be used to impersonate you and steal your identity is already mind-bogglingly stupid.
The system was never designed to be used for anything beyond Social Security, and from the beginning using it as an identifier has been discouraged. That doesn't stop companies from using it like that though.
Using it as an identifier isn't really a problem. Using at as credentials, being somehow able to impersonate someone just by reciting a not very secret identifier, that is mind-bogglingly stupid.
Well, they probably wouldn't if there was a viable alternative.
And was specifically restricted, back in the day.
National ID cards are not a way to impersonate someone, because they ARE NOT authentication. By themselves, they're almost public information, and just because you know someone's ID number does not mean you're them, like nobody thinks you're someone else just because you know their phone number.
Many countries are rolling out ID cards that do include authentication - they have integrated chips, like bank cards, and you can use your secret pin to prove you're who you say you are, but that's totally different.
The US system is what's mind bogglingly stupid. There's this magic number that you're supposed to keep secret because nobody has any other way of checking if someone is who they say they are?
The Estonian system with these cards is absolutely amazing and should be a role model for the world.
Mind-boggingly stupid has another name: the American way!