Holy shit, that's what they get for being so evil that they trained dogs as suicide bombers.

It's not trained to get the right answer. It's trained to know what sequence of words tends to follow another sequence of words, and then a little noise is added to that function to make it a bit creative. So, if you ask it to make a legal document, it has been trained on millions of legal documents, so it knows exactly what sequences of words are likely. But, it has no concept of whether or not those words are "correct". It's basically making a movie prop legal document that will look really good on camera, but should never be taken into court.

while also blaming employees

Yeah it's not even drift. It's just smoke and mirrors that looks convincing if you don't know what you're talking about. It's why you see writers say "AI is great at coding, but not writing" and then you see coders say "AI is great at writing, but not coding."

If you have any idea what good looks like, you can immediately recognize AI ain't it.

For a fun example, at my company we had a POC done by a very well known AI company. It was supposed to analyze a MS Project schedule, then compare tasks in that schedule to various data sources related to to tasks, then flag potential schedule risks. In the demo to the COO, they showed the AI look at a project schedule and say "Task XYZ could be at risk due to vendor quality issues or potential supply chain issues."

The COO was amazed. Wow it looked through all this data and came back with such great insight. Later I dug under the hood and found that it wasn't looking at any data behind the scenes at all. It was just answering specifically "what could make a project task at risk?" and then giving a hypothetical answer.

Anyone using AI to make any sort of decision is basically doing the equivalent of Googling your issue and then taking the top response as gospel. Yeah that might work for a few basic things, but anything important that requires any thought whatsoever is going to fail spectacularly.