186
Hasan Piker joins the Nuéstra America Flotilla.
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
186 points (99.5% liked)
Pop Culture
102 readers
354 users here now
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
It's not my argument but I do accept the argument that a Harris admin would have been marginally better.
Nah it would have condoned genocide. It's good that the Democrats lost, and continue to lose, until they course correct. And if they never do, then they should be destroyed as a party to make way for something better
While I agree, I'm not in danger of getting sent to cecot (immediately).
You are also not a Palestinian, who have called to boycott support of all genocidal Zionist parties
Without solidarity we are nothing. The moment we start prioritizing certain people over others we are lost
I have no idea why you're saying this to me?
The point isn't that Harris's policies are identical to Trump's, but that this endless capitulation to 95% Hitler versus 100% Hitler will inevitably turn into capitulation to 100% Hitler against 105% Hitler and 195% Hitler against 200% Hitler, and that a left opposition that is willing to withhold its support is necessary in order to stop this spiral into fascism by either forcing the "left" candidate to be more progressive or by building a third party. Resources spent on campaigning for cops and making them look more popular by obeying them (whatever you claim to feel in your heart) are ultimately just contributing to the spiral even if in a portion of elections (probably no more than half), you get 5% lower Hitler. It is counterproductive to ending elections of X% Hitler vs Y% Hitler.
Yeah I agree on all points. At the same time I doubt the Harris admin would have given ice a blank check and started occupying American cities in year 1. I am just stating I'm sympathetic to the argument of casting blue votes in swing states no matter the candidate.
Not my personal opinion but especially if someone is feeling targeted directly, I'm sympathetic.
I agree, but she would be sure to facilitate the next Republican doing that by playing loudly into other xenophobic policies like the concentration camps, border wall, etc. and normalizing such an attitude to her constituents. She would pave the way to people doing just as bad and then doing worse, while Dems claim to be morally superior because they are a few steps behind while walking just as readily down the path to Hell.
I'm sympathetic to people who fall for this bullshit in the sense that I'm sympathetic to an abuse victim whose perspective was distorted, because that's literally what the Dems are. The Dems literally argue "We will hurt you and people you care about, but so with the GOP, so you not being hurt is off the table. Supporting us hurting you is reducing harm to you and if you don't support us, aren't you really the person hurting people?" There are no words for how disgusting it is.
I agree completely. I see this discussion similar to: do you flee or stay and prepare? There's nothing I can say to someone who's thought through either position.
I think that sympathizing with how someone feels -- like sympathizing with an abuse victim who falsely believes that they need their abuser -- does not require validating their conclusion as actually true, and we should seek to change their minds, we should have things we can say, even if we need to be careful and respectful and also the answer changes in different contexts (with the stay/go example, where there often is a right answer but it depends a lot on the person's circumstances, and taking the position that there is a right answer is not the same as trying to force them to follow that answer).
I apologize for the run-on sentence.