527
Not that limit (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] carmo55@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is just not true. The normal limit we have here means a limit would have to exist from both directions and they should be equal. They're not, so the limit doesn't exist.

One-sided limits would be denoted by x -> 5– and x -> 5+ or similar.

PS: in complex analysis, there is no distinction between +infty and -infty, so there it would be correct to say the function has limit infty at 5.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

In my experience with maths, there's a whole bunch of different conventions all over the place, so it might've genuinely been how they were taught, even if you were taught differently...

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's my experience too. When we did this in school we always defined from which side we were approaching the function.

[-] JustAPenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You're right. But in this case, which is the case I was referring to, there is no two sided limit. It is discontinuous. It is in this case which I was referring to. Sorry for not being clear.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
527 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

19027 readers
135 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS