76

A quarter of Canadian families are facing food insecurity even when most have a breadwinner working a permanent, full-time job, new research suggests.

Researchers from the University of Toronto’s food insecurity research program analyzed Statistics Canada income data to better understand how Canadians’ jobs affect their access to food.

Their study, published last December in the journal Canadian Public Policy, found that the main earner in two-thirds of all households experiencing food insecurity held a permanent, full-time job.

Study co-author Tim Li said the findings suggest wages aren’t keeping up with the cost of living.

“This really pushes back against any narrative that this is only about precarious work and this idea that if people just had a full-time, permanent job, then they would not be food insecure,” Li said. “We’re showing that that’s not the case.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

You don't see a problem with a few companies bending laws and bribing to create a monopoly on a human necessity making $828 million in profits period? For-profit grocery monopolies are a huge part of the problem. Food (at least basic healthy food) should be non-profit. Period.

They only made 4.2% profit. Boo-fucking-hoo. Make food access non-profit, and allow these companies to have their for-profit groceries if they want, sell stuff you can't get at the non-profits, whatever. If they bitch about not making enough money they can switch industries.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

Given the system we have, this is a non-issue.

In a perfect world we wouldn't need capitalism at all, but we don't live in a perfect world. We will never have a perfect world, humans are not perfect. We're greedy little fuckers.

A 4.2% Profit is very low. Extremely low. That profit level is actually so low that it's almost losing money for investors once you account for inflation. Any lower and there wouldn't be any investors, and we'd see grocery store closures and price increases until it went back up again to attract investment.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm very much for socializing certain industries. Healthcare, Electricity, Internet/Communications, Water, Sewer, Roads, should all be run by the government in my opinion. They each have particular problems where Capitalism has massive market failures. Healthcare is too necessary and usually too urgent to be able to "shop around" for the best deal. Electricity and Internet have natural monopolies on transmission due to infrastructure building requirements.

This just doesn't apply to grocery stores. There's some fierce competition among the major players, minor players exist, and there isn't an obvious market failure like regulatory capture or a monopoly leading to ridiculous profit margins or an inability for new entrants to join the market.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supermarket_chains_in_Canada

In my mid-sized city, there all three major players present of course (Pattison, Loblaw, Empire), then we've got walmart, costco, whole foods, h-mart, and I know of at least a dozen smaller grocers and full time farm markets that aren't even chains. There's even a co-op grocery store owned by members.

I don't mean to downplay the situation, but it's quite clear when you look at the numbers that grocery stores are NOT the root of the issue with food price increases.

If you really want grocery stores to drop the prices more, do you know what would be even more useful than taking their 4.2% profit? Take the land from their landlords, and lease it to them for $1. Grocery stores typically are paying 4-8% of their total revenue in land prices.

The highest costs of grocery stores (in descending order) are Inventory, Labour, and Rent.

Now imagine if, instead of just dropping their rent prices, you actually dropped the land/housing costs for EVERYONE. That reduces how much the famer needs to spend, that reduces how much the processing plant spends, that reduces the amount the manufacturer spends, that reduces the amount the warehousers spend, and it reduces the amount the grocery stores spend.

It gets worse though when you realize that housing prices are also why labour prices are so high. If your rent/mortgage was half, you wouldn't need to be paid as much money to have the same standard of living, it wouldn't reduce your costs by half, there are non-rent costs in your budget, but say you earn the median income of $80,0000, and you're spending $3000 a month on rent for your family, if your rent dropped to $1500, you could earn $62,000 and have the same life. That's reducing labour costs by 22%.

Then take that and apply it to the entire chain as well. Reduced labour for the famer, processor, manufacturer, warehouse, grocery store.

This is the big thing people are failing to understand. Land owners are taking a huge cut of everyone's money right now. This is where the money flows to in the economy. I'm not talking about corporate land owners either, I'm talking about every single person who owns real estate from some random big corporate entity all the way down to your parents who bought a house 20 years ago and have seen it's value go up by 4x since then. That value had to come from somewhere, and it's coming straight out of everyone's pockets in the form of higher prices.

It's a hidden tax on everyone that the government controls through policy, but which the government doesn't receive the money for.

The government has the power to end that, but there's very little appetite for it because it's far too removed from public understanding for the public to even know what to ask for to fix it.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

That profit level is actually so low that it’s almost losing money for investors once you account for inflation. Any lower and there wouldn’t be any investors

Good! Why are we allowing investors to leech a profit off of a basic necessity of life? No one should be milking extra profit out of the poor people trying to survive. A system that allows this deserves to collapse.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago

You're a fucking moron.

Should the government take over every farm, food processor, food manufacturer, and transportation company too? They're all profiting off a basic necessity of life.

Should the government take over all housing construction, development, renovation? That's also a necessity of life.

Countries have tried this before, it didn't end well.

Capitalism is working just fine for groceries right now, why throw that out when the real problem is the current land ownership and energy systems?

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You’re a fucking moron.

Please avoid personal attack when arguing.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
76 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

11490 readers
643 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS