204
submitted 2 days ago by dude@lemmings.world to c/news@lemmings.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago

So...they "can't guarantee" that they won't break the law? Because sending any kind of federal law enforcement agents to polling places would be highly illegal.

[-] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

This administration has proved time and again they dont care if something is illegal, they will do it and get away with it.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

They'll "try". But they will eventually get blocked. The problem is that it can take time to go through the courts, before they get shut down...and elections aren't going to wait. State legislatures need to shore up their own legislation in advance. That way the decisions have already been made, before they try.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

this is why they won't say they will because that has a chance of causing congressional or legal action.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

This is why state legislatures need to introduce legislation now. Force the Trump administration to challenge them in court, and get a ruling before it's too late.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

agreed. I expect to see some but a certain party will call it ridiculous and half another party won't support it.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
204 points (99.0% liked)

news

587 readers
931 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS