104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
104 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
52850 readers
296 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Weapons actually do something you could consider useful, burning up an acre of the Amazon to generate a sfw image of Nami from one piece isn't
Wielding the debunked accusation like a club.
I would argue generating art is less harmful for humanity than crafting weapons designed to kill others and wage war.
some AI slop hallucination of a character it didn't create isn't art
yes those are uses of weapons