125
Picture above: what doesn't get you banned. Picture below: what gets you banned
Link to my alt account's comment (picture below)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
125 points (97.0% liked)
Slop.
778 readers
604 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I linked Wikipedia extensively though, there's nothing more western than that. That's the reason why there's no explanation for the ban in the modlog. I've been polite and explained everything using western sources, and it's not enough not to get banned.
Oh believe me, they got upset when I mixed up which article on Wikipedia Soviet Democracy, by Pat Sloan is referenced on, refusing to engage with the fact that even Wikipedia uses it as a source because I didn't perfectly remember which page it was on. They are doing this deliberately.
Maybe posting this to "yepowertrippinbastards" could be a way to drive people away from piefed.social given how it's run by a reactionary?
You can if you wish, but I'd focus more on PJ than Piefed.Social itself, as PJ in particular is a problematic power mod. People already know about PieFed.Social.