Rushing regulatory for a construction project where failures are as severe as they can potentially be with nuclear is beyond deranged.

Getting to the timelines you're mentioning would require a mature nuclear industry with standardized builds, something which would take more than a decade to develop, at a steep premium.

Again, I support any investor willing to go there to do so, but there's a good reason none do - these things quite simply do not pencil out.

SMRs take a few years, and a fraction of the price, which is why China is building them and already has one on line.

Where's a real world example of a nuclear plant being built in just 4 years? In the US it's more like 10 years, at least.

No one's building them because they're barely profitable even after they're up and running for many years.