13
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They were new unproven characters, so I understand why they weren't high on the list. But there is also a lot of possibility with unproven characters.

Look at Guardians of the Galaxy, before the film no one had ever really heard of them, now they're one of the most popular rides at Disney World. From unknown to mainstream.

Eternals is definitely a fun idea for a film, so I can see why Chloe Zhao was interested in it. The story however just wasn't quite there. You could drop the whole Deviants story and I don't think anyone would care, or at least remove the "super" Deviant... Or actually give that character and storyline development.

Plus as she mentioned there are a lot of fun characters, but we're limited by the time of a film. So we need to either cut some character or switch to a longer form of media.

I hope The Eternals aren't gone gone and they get a chance to at least finish their story and/or redeem themselves. Look at Thor, Thor had two solo films that were the weakest of the MCU, but he got extra development in the Avengers films and then a reinvention for Thor Ragnarok.

[-] edcasting@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You can't make the GotG comparison; I think it's clear that franchise succeeded because of its creative direction, not because they were new characters. You need people who understand the genre and why it works. Zhao may be a great director, and visually the movie was beautiful, but just because you have an Oscar doesn't mean you can make gold out of everything.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So I think the GotG comparison still works, but I completely agree that the creative direction is the key difference.

Chloe Zhao probably couldn't have done Guardians and James Gunn probably couldn't have done Eternals.

I think Zhao saw something in Eternals, something that, based on this article, Feige saw someone who saw something in Eternals. He was wrong. Or Zhao was wrong. Or budget or something.

But I think taking an IP from comics to film/TV is a whole other type of challenge. Look at the early comic book films compared to today. We get very different results.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Marvel Studios

4836 readers
6 users here now

Lemmy


Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.


Upcoming Film:

Upcoming TV:


Film Discussion:

TV Discussion:


Sony's Spider-Man Universe Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.


Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,


Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS