190
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Tobirik@sh.itjust.works to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] misk@piefed.social 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Heavily subsidised by selling oil to less oil-rich countries. At least some money goes to people rather than a local monarch. Good for Norway, who also lucked on hydro power, but if they really cared about the environment they’d actually stop drilling.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

If we really cared we'd also importantly be buying fewer new cars every year. Over-consumption is running wild.

That is true, But automobile sharing is where that is heading to.

[-] kiterios@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Imo, I'd rather see norway continue drilling but improve the controls over the oil fund and allocate more of it towards investing in building clean energy infrastructure in oil consuming countries. The oil fund has the potential to be a driver for combating climate change disproportionate to the negative impacts of drilling at norwegian scale.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org -2 points 2 weeks ago

Producing the currently needed fossil fuels from the cheapest sources is harm reduction.

Less accessible Ressource deposit require more effort, hence emissions.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
190 points (98.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3552 readers
7 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS