you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 7 months ago (72 children)

DNC platform is tax the rich, raise minimum wage, and fund social programs. They have had 48 or less senators for over 13 years, currently 45. The last time they had 58 for less than two months they caucused with 2 independents to pass Medicaid. They would have launched a Public Option identical to Germany's healthcare if not for one of those independents opposing it.

DNC is liberal, DNC is on our side, Vote DNC. Or, if an independent polls higher, then vote for them because at least they're not a Republican and removing every single Republican should be our goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 72 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago (21 children)

    Many democrats are on our side. Historically, traditionally the DNC AKA leadership absolutely isn't. There have been some changes in recent history. And that's good. But till there's enough history to plot out a new pattern of behavior. We'd be fools to treat them as if they changed.

    The biggest problem with the Democratic party for decades has been that they're serving two masters. Lip-service to the voters to try and get their neoliberal candidates in office. But legislating largely for the major donors that took over funding the party once Reagan broke the unions. The DNC talks the talk. But atm are unable to walk the walk. I hope that changes soon. With each death and retirement, things look a little better for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago* (8 children)

    Many democrats are on our side.

    Yeah, like three of them.

    And the rest are fighting harder to stop Democrats who actually are on our side than they are against fascists: people like Mamdani and Platner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Yep, but thankfully it looks like Mamdani and Platner might be changing the equation. Fingers crossed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [+] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Everyone does. AOC and Mamdani literally are marching with us. It's largely leadership that keeps anything from getting done or changing. Blame them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    AOC and Mamdani are leadership? Did anyone tell them or the DNC that?

    The closest we're getting to a shell game here is painting with a broad brush and lumping them all into one shell. You're never going to get the old guard out if you continue to make enemies of the ones actually working to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I was. Literally what I was talking about in the post you replied to before this. Did you reply to the wrong person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    The DNC has had multiple opportunities to tax the rich, raise minimum wage, and fund social programs during my lifetime and they have not done so once. I don’t believe them anymore when they say it’s their platform.

    Being anti-Republican isn’t enough anymore. This shit will keep happening for as long as we allow private ownership of the means of production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    The quiet part is there wasn’t a plan to tax the rich for another decade or two when they thought shit would actually hit the fan. Shit hit the fan much sooner than they hoped, as this was an issue they were going to leave the next generation to handle. It’s more an issue of the baby boomers having had control of the DNC for decades.

    Business was booming during the Obama years; why did it matter to the rich people in Congress if the rest of us had to hustle more? That’s the real reason they didn’t tax the rich when they could have, well that and they were getting tons of funding from the big businesses.

    The pro-corporate Dem plans went up in flames quite a lot when Hillary was not elected. Now that shit got worse much sooner than they hoped, they’re in a rock and a hard place because they still don’t want to tax their rich buddies but the voters are actually pushing to vote them out if they keep doing nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (26 children)

    DNC platform is tax the rich, raise minimum wage, and fund social programs.

    And their campaign promises have so much value, clearly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    they have absolutely no chance intention of pulling any of it off

    I corrected this slightly, but you're right. They know that none of it is actually going to get done, and they have the excuses already lined up: not enough votes, obstruction, filibuster, parliamentarian, etc. etc. etc.

    It's the same reason some billionaires insist that they support higher taxation on themselves, because they know it is never going to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (23 children)

    Maybe if we had more than 48 we could find out. Let's call their bluff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    I agree.

    And also, itd be great if senators like Bernie, Warren and others, actually called out their "peers" who are obviously blocking progress.

    I think my two Senators: Kaine, and Warner are playing a shell game where they go as corporate as they can and still give the appearance of resistance.

    And yet I ha e to vote for them until there is a viable alternative. Its just so frustrating the lack of transparency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    Nonsense.

    Donald has the same amount of power that Clinton, Obama, and Biden had.

    The problem isn't a lack of power. It's their predilection to enrich themselves at the expense of their constituents. The only difference is Donald isn't offering shitty excuses like Dems do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Every time the Dems have had a majority in my lifetime, they have failed to even discuss progressive legislation, let alone try to enact it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The Dems had control for a few months in 2011, and that was when they passed the ACA. That was the only point in my lifetime they controlled the government.

    The last time before that was 1961-1969. Which included such legislation as the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act, though in sure you can find plenty more that was passed.

    Not to mention that the Dems have absolutely been discussing progressive legislation. It's failed to pass, passed and then been vetoed, or even at times been passed and then struck down by conservative courts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    In 2003 they banned campaign funding from PACs instead allowing only a maximum from individuals, but in 2007-2010 the SCOTUS shut it down then declared it unconstitutional.

    The Inflation Reduction Act also contained a ton of good stuff not even related to Inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No, I'm pretty sure Democrats are for more funding for ICE. Don't project your ideals into these ghouls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment