Canada won't ban X. But experts say it has few other options to deal with its 'nudification' problem (www.nationalobserver.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What's important to understand is that through his role in Brookfield, Carney is a major investor in X, which is substantially impacting his ability to act.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Brookfield is literally Canada’s BlackRock, he still regularly meets with their board members.

Strictly speaking - true, but in practice it's more useful to see them as a multinational corpo. They will shift capital and operations across borders to maximize profits. I'm not insinuating there's no way to stop capital from crossing borders. I'm just working in the current neolib state of affairs where we're refusing to do that.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026

46 points (96.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

3107 readers

24 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lightrush@lemmy.ca

grte@lemmy.ca