this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
906 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59434 readers
3120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (21 children)

There has to be a USB-C. Some people will always want wires to transfer data, even if it's through their "wireless charger", which is proprietary.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (9 children)

And some people will always want a headphone jack... oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I can't imagine Europe wouldn't lose their shit if Apple removed it entirely. And if Android manufacturers did that consumers would also promptly lose their shit.

Beyond the consumer, having a physical port is beneficial to Apple. Businesses use attached devices (e.g. barcode scanners, DSLR camera attachments, charging stations) all the time. It's more common on Android phones, but I do see iPhones using these sorts of things. My local movie theater uses iPhones to scan tickets with an attached Lightning scanner, for example.

I don't disagree that wireless charging is more convenient, but from the standpoint of being in emergency situations where a cable is needed to charge your phone, it wouldn't be easily possible if the port is removed. People might carry around charging bricks, and while wireless charging bricks do exist they're not commonplace and they're certainly slower than charging by wire. I can tell you nobody will want to carry around a portable wireless charger, although MagSafe is almost already just that.

Playing devil's advocate, it's possible Apple does want things like portable wireless chargers to proliferate, like the one you can buy that slap onto the back of your phone. It means you're buying more of their shit, which is something they seem to love so much. It would mean you're buying MagSafe chargers or whatever proprietary crap they manufacture. I still do see it becoming an issue in emergency situations though, e.g. teens (a large user base of iPhones) use their phones a lot and borrow chargers from each other all the time.

Impossible? No. Unlikely? Yes, for now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They might adopt something like pogo pins for physical connections, similar to the ipads

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have an example of this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, as I said, the smart connector on the ipad. It is used to connect the keyboard if I'm not mistaken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I forgot about the keyboard attachments

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)