Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 302 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 208 points 3 years ago (38 children)

    TFW a wifi transfer literally loads files from your phone faster than a fucking cable.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 188 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Amazing how this company is so successful knowing they're just scamming their clients

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 135 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Apple fanboys drooling over the company as it continues to shit on them.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    I doubt your typical apple user will use the usb port for anything other than charging.

    If they are going to improve transfer speeds it's not going to happen in the same iteration they're being made to switch to usb c for two reasons:

    1. They want to incetivise users to upgrade to a newer model 16
    2. They will want to take credit for faster speeds. Otherwise people will think usb c is just faster than lighting they were stuck with for years.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 115 points 3 years ago (34 children)

    ITT people pretending this is a spite based move, when realistically it is probably cutting costs by reusing the same hardware they used for lightning ports just soldering on a USB-C port instead of a lightning one.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 92 points 3 years ago* (39 children)

    How do apple fan boys keeps eating this shit-sandwich year after year?

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • load more comments (39 replies)
    [–] 86 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    They are going to limit it to USB 2.0 speeds so in 3 or 4 years they can declare some new magical advancement and bump it up to full 3.0 speeds.

    Apple purposefully limits things so that they have something to announce in the future. They aren't dumb. They know the advancements in smartphones has been starting to slow down. So they meter out the advances over many years in incremental updates to give their customers a reason to upgrade.

    You will hear something like this from every reviewer after an Apple event: "The changes were small, but taken together the new insert product name here might be well worth the upgrade price."

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 81 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    In other news: company with long history of selling over-priced, under featured products to aspirational nitwits does it again!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 79 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (6 children)

    Yes, I can't wait for them to launch the newest innovative tech of Type C for iPhone, which will offer more speed and better compatibility cause they are the good guys who swear they would protect your data and keep an eye on your photos too.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    Why anyone would buy into this crap is beyond me.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 71 points 3 years ago (18 children)

    ITT: people who don't realize that most USB-C cables are USB 2.0

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 65 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago* (9 children)

    Well, charger cables are usually at USB 2.0 speed because USB-PD works the same, but signal integrity doesn't matter as much, so you can make a longer, more flexible cable without using in-cable shielding...

    So this is misleading, since the included cable coming in 2.0 speed (missing pins) absolutely does not mean that the iPhone USB-C port will only support 2.0.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    To the surprise of no one. However, EU is already on top of this. After this law was enacted they realized just how scummy Apple is, not sure how they managed to miss that especially considering they have to fine them and threaten with market ban if they didn't uphold 2 year mandatory warranty consumer protection laws in EU guarantee.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 44 points 3 years ago

    So, worse than a Galaxy S5. Got it.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    What a messy article. The title says that the cables are limited to 2.0 speeds (which they might as well be), the subtitle mentions charging speed as opposed to transfer speed and the article itself then talks about the port on the device having 2.0 speeds (for non "Pro" models).

    Anyways, of course they gimp the base model on purpose. Every company does to set the more expensive models apart obviously, but Apple drives it to the extremes especially in recent years, which makes their line-up incredibly confusing. I mean they've gone out of their way to make their 10th gen base iPad use the old Apple Pencil, and they still don't laminate the display even after they redesigned the exterior.

    If you want a new iPhone this fall and you're looking for something in the price range of the standard iPhone 15 (which will still be a very expensive phone of course), I'd recommend looking for previous year's "Pro" model. The iPhone 13 Pro dropped around the iPhone 14 price at launch, and it's essentially better in almost every way.

    And because people will mention it: of course, you can also get a phone from a different manufacturer if it suits you, or keep your current phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Usb 2.0 is 23 years old now.

    There's a line between "enhancing the pro model by shitting on everyone else" but like this is just disrespectful.

    But hey your money, spend that shit as stupidly as you want

    (3.0 came out 15 years ago for reference, it'll be older than some kids getting the phone ffs)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 35 points 3 years ago (50 children)
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    Technically, they are. Type C is just port shape. Protocol version is a different matter, however newer versions are backwards compatible. What they are doing is not restricting functionality but to unlock fastest charging speed you have to buy approved cables. It's sort of a gray area but luckily EU already caught them planning to do this, so work to change it is already underway.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Little bit of a strange article.

    First, it's about data transfer speeds. I don't think... anyone else in my extended family, and certainly none of the iPhone users, use a cable to transfer data frequently.

    But more importantly - the subtitle of the article says that only the pro models offer faster charging speeds. Despite the article being exclusively about data transfer speeds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    Why?

    Not that I use the junk this company ships to stores but a part of me would like to hear the meeting where someone proposed this and the rationale to support it.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    nothing about using a USB-C cable inherently means it has to support USB3.

    framing it as "limits it to USB 3 Speeds" is misleading. iPhone has only ever supported USB 2, all they're doing here is continuing to not upgrade to USB 3. the meeting where somebody proposed it went like this:

    hey, should we put a USB 3 chip in the new iPhone?
    nah, let's just keep using the same one as the last generation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago

    Merely a rumor. Apple is known to put multiple false rumors into their supplier chain to find leakers.

    I’m going to wait for the upcoming formal announcement and specs.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Unless it's limited by hardware this will be a main cause for jailbreaking your iPhone.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I'm confused, is this a strategy meant to persuade people to keep using the lightning cable bullshit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›