You’re dramatically reducing your credibility by citing The Daily Mail.

LMAO.

Are you a bot?

You've completely missed the point of mentioning the Daily Mail there. XD

Read that again, and you'll see...

He’s in the big club (that do not care about us at all). If we had a theyrule.net type website for them at the time in the UK, we’d see more of the close ties, like to the media who peddled the lies [like The Daily Mail’s (iirc) “95% of benefits claimants are fraudulent scroungers” [later revealed less than 0.7%]] to drum up hate sufficient to have the public enthusiastic for the cull they did not realise was happening [unless they went out of their way to look up callum’s list('s harrowing stories from the mere start, before the numbers got too big and numbing), black triangle campaign, disabled people against cuts’ no more deaths from benefits cuts campaign, or others independently reporting on it], with complete corporate media silence on the matter, until Francesca Martinez managed to break the silence on a BBC live recording of Question Time in 2019 ("TV Moment of the Year) opening with the wry “I don’t know if this is widely reported, but…”. Carney’s very much part of it. Friendly warning, Canada.

See? Entirely highlighting what a peddler of lies The Daily Mail is.

Did you just skim read, see Daily Mail, and think I was citing them as a source of truth, entirely missing the context that they were mentioned for their crimes, for their lies, for their spreading hate, for their complicity in genocide?