45
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
45 points (83.6% liked)
World News
40391 readers
385 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Everyone replied to you in more than one way and there are at least 4 or 5 examples of people doing these lazy strawmen. You're the one who, as you showed, doesn't bother reading or thinking critically. Imagine being offended because I oppose using some rando's POV on news as factual evidence.
I propose you a brain game. I will create my own media bias fact fuck, and everything that's not lefty is considered biased.
I missed these. Where were the links to past comments? Or are you counting generic arguments, because those don't paint a very clear picture so I didn't count them. And they seemed very much like the same argument with different words: for some reason they imply sources in towards the centre of the political spectrum are without bias and for some reason that means people don't read them critically when this is pointed out.
I get that from what I guess your views are but it's also not particularly equivalent. Especially for the US media landscape and for better or worse a lot of these checks seem to have their roots there.
https://lemmy.ml/post/41090217/23074153
https://lemmy.ml/post/41090217/23073183
The second link is exactly what I was after. Thanks.
Am I misunderstanding the first just after waking up? It seems to be a summary that points to this comment as its example:
https://lemmy.ml/comment/8913172
And that seems to be someone referencing the site while dripping with sarcasm and seems to be making the case that the OP is.