-14
New Hampshire Has No Income Tax
(docs.freestater.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
-14 points (23.1% liked)
Libertarian Discussion
348 readers
1 users here now
Place for discussion from a Libertarian perspective, meaning less top-down control and more individual liberty. In general, the intent is discussion about issues and not a discussion on libertarianism itself or any of its branches.
Be sure to respect the instance rules, and please keep discussion civil and backed by high quality sources where possible.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not well researched on this, but off the top of my head it doesn't seem like the best policy (disproportionally impacts low income people.) The state still needs to collect money for maibtaining roads, libraries, schools, etc. This is likely coming from stuff like sales tax, etc. People on lower incomes are more likely to spend a higher portion of their income on goods (food, gas, etc.) Since the price of those is semi-fixed relative to income, while those who are of higher income are more likely to save the money. This leads to low income people effectively being taxed more of their wage than high income people. Might be totally wrong though, would really need to look at the policies on this style of taxation and if it makes any sense. What probably matters most is where the governments revenue is actually coming from.
New Hampshire has no sales tax either. At the local level we have property tax. We also collect a decent amount of money from toll roads, a tax on liquor, a tax on gambling profits and a tax on hotel stays and restaurants. Oh and there is a payroll tax.
As you can see, we rely more on user fees than broad based taxes. The way to lower your taxes is to not partake in these services.
As you mentioned, both income and sales tax are basically a tax on living your normal life.