you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

verifiable evidence that the damage was pre-existing that the note leaver could somehow provide

Like a photo of the driver circling the car, unable to spot where the damage was, immediately after reading the note? Hmmmm....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    No, I read that - it's just not substantial. If the ding already existed, my point is that the driver is overlooking it in the photo we're seeing. That is proof that it is not new damage and shouldn't be considered in this case. I get that you're trying to CYA, but it doesn't need to be to this degree of hyper-vigilance.

  • source
  • parent