79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] adhd_traco@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nobody can live their life with zero connections to deadly violence, so trying to change minds by force is coercive. And they hate that, so they want a pejorative word for it, so they came up with calling it “terrorism.”

Ehhh...
I feel like you are generalising a lot of variance into "anti terror" crowd. There are layers to non-violence and people have different beliefs.

Also, in the Healthcare case, the target was MUCH more directly connected to the harm that is acted against, as well as in intent and severity, than the victims in 9/11. He was the target, and I don't see anything like intent to invoke fear in the general public.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

It was meant to invoke fear in other CEOs

[-] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Other healthcare CEOs count as "the general public"

But you definitely have valid grounds to consider it subjective. While I mentioned it for comparison, a religious extremist targeting the janitor in the world trade center is not the same as someone justifiably targeting Brian Thompson

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
79 points (95.4% liked)

Solarpunk

8512 readers
28 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS