you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 9 months ago (33 children)

Really ridiculous how vegans think this will put off any meat eaters from eating meat.

Actually it's having the opposite effect, it just infuriates people and makes them hungry.

I myself am hungry for a chicken now!

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (15 children)

    So what combination of words should vegans be using to convince meateaters to stop consuming meat?

    I see a lot of people telling vegans what not to say, but not a lot about what they should be saying to make their case.

    What would you find to be a convincing argument?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    unbiased, true statements. it may not be convincing, but falsehood and hyperbole isn't a good way to convince anyone of anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    I get downvoted a lot by .worlders even for unbiased true statements, but I still think it's the most effective for convincing debatebros. Irl the most effective is just having good meals that happen to be vegan, so people around you see it's really not that hard and you can still eat good food.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You don't. If you treat being vegan like a religion where you feel the need to convert everyone else then you're in a cult. A normal person would just present their case, make their arguments, and live their life based on their principles... That's it. If someone is convinced that you're correct then they'll adopt your values on their own, and if they don't you just have to accept their choice and move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    By your definition and description, capitalism itself is a cult. Advertisers spend a whole lotta time and effort trying to convince people to buy shit that they don't really need. The tech sector trying to cram AI down everyone's throat certainly must qualify.

    I would also note that the animal ag industry exhibits this cultist behavior in trying to convince people that the atrocities it commits are OK. And trying to convince people to consume more meat than what is medically beneficial. To the point that they'll utilize state violence to shut down dissenters.

    Society is full of cults.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    You could start by talking like a civilized person without insults and maybe use facts, research, philosophy, etc. to explain your position why eating meat is bad and have a civilized debate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    This isn’t going to be popular but meat eaters need to put their ego aside and hear what those who speak out against animal torture are trying to tell them. Factory farmed meat is anything but civilized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "need to put their ego aside" - pot, kettle. The more compelling arguments I have seen have to do with the amounts consumed being both unhealthy and not economic.

    Self righteous egotistical fools just make me disregard their position.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    My feelings aren’t hurt. Over the past 30 years I’d heard it all. It’s time for you to understand that all the rape, torture, and death are unnecessary. Call me whatever name you want, I really don’t care.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    my most successful tactic was just to talk about my own decisions as they relate to reducing my contributions to an overall system of suffering that i as a human also suffer under. applying no pressure other than peer pressure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    To be blunt, other than demonstrating plant-based foods and offering my experiences and recommendations of non-animal options (food, clothing, or otherwise), it isn't even a discussion I put much effort engaging in. Typically it comes up due to questions people have for me when they see what I eat (and don't eat).

    My actual "counter-strategy" for the animal ag industry is to sell the childfree lifestyle, since that indirectly results in fewer meateaters. This has several advantages:

    • it's fairly easy, since I can really play up the economic reasons. If not that, I can point to environmental degradation and a laundry list of other things.

    • childfree is already an order of magnitude more common than veganism, so it is already a bit mainstream

    • actually following through with it is easier since it is less frequently challenged and very defensible in terms of personal freedom

    • building on the previous point, it is promoting a freedom rather than a restriction. It's even in the name: childfree

    I do not, and absolutely will not push it. That goes directly against my concept of promoting personal freedom. I simply present the information, and it sort of just sells itself. If someone doesn't see the advantages, oh well.

    I'm sure this will piss some people off (including vegans), which just goes to show that there really is no pleasing everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe just stop trying to push your personal beliefs on everyone else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    So I should never try to persuade anyone of anything?

    How can one change society if we aren't allowed to challenge people's beliefs? I'm glad that people have confronted others on the various inequalities and injustices in society in order to effect change, rather than just going "welp, that's just how things are!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 9 months ago (14 children)

    if you are infuriated by somebody pointing out the cruelties of your actions then i think that is a reflection of you, not them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (13 children)

    Let's see how you like being called names:

    You skinny shitmouth, go eat some cabbage grown in cow shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Weird that this didn't affect me or want to change my diet at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Congratulations ... you got the point of the first comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (8 children)

    I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point.

    They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated.

    Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them.

    Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet.

    The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan"

    I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

    While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it.

    Nah, op is correct.

    So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated?

    Nope.

    They said:

    it just infuriates people

    They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated".

    The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind.

  • source
  • parent