▲ 768 ▼ me_irl (feddit.org) submitted 9 months ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/me_irl@lemmy.world 340 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (13 children) Let's see how you like being called names: You skinny shitmouth, go eat some cabbage grown in cow shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (11 children) Weird that this didn't affect me or want to change my diet at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] remon@ani.social 18 points 9 months ago (9 children) Congratulations ... you got the point of the first comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (8 children) I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point. They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated. Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them. Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet. The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan" I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children) Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca 1 point 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago Good one. I’ll respond with “enjoy your colostomy bag, you barbaric animal torturer”. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (11 children) Weird that this didn't affect me or want to change my diet at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] remon@ani.social 18 points 9 months ago (9 children) Congratulations ... you got the point of the first comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (8 children) I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point. They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated. Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them. Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet. The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan" I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children) Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca 1 point 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] remon@ani.social 18 points 9 months ago (9 children) Congratulations ... you got the point of the first comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (8 children) I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point. They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated. Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them. Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet. The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan" I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children) Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (8 children) I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point. They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated. Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them. Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet. The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan" I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children) Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them. Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet. The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan" I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money. While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children) Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children) not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it. Nah, op is correct. So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Nope. They said: it just infuriates people They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated". The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago Good one. I’ll respond with “enjoy your colostomy bag, you barbaric animal torturer”. permalink fedilink source parent