763
me_irl (feddit.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Let's see how you like being called names:

You skinny shitmouth, go eat some cabbage grown in cow shit.

[-] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Weird that this didn't affect me or want to change my diet at all.

[-] remon@ani.social 18 points 2 months ago

Congratulations ... you got the point of the first comment.

[-] canofcam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point.

They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said "see how you like it" and... I wasn't infuriated.

Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

No. They're not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them.

Talking shit about someone's diet isn't going to make them change their diet.

The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn't a vegan as "anti-vegan". Or that everyone that disagrees with you is "anti-vegan"

I don't think the cashier at my local grocery store is "anti-boardgames" just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago

Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan...no it isn't. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling.

[-] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

It's not the name calling it's that it basically shuts down anyone actually considering it because that's how humans work. If you say you are bad for doing this the most common reactions are to become defensive or ignore it, both of which are counterproductive to someone changing their mind.

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff.....or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing?

[-] canofcam@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn't my intention. Try re-reading it.

Nah, op is correct.

So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating?

[-] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated?

Nope.

They said:

it just infuriates people

They said "people", not "I". They didn't say "I am infuriated".

The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they're hungry.

[-] canofcam@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

You should apply to be a politician because bullshitting comes so easy to you.

[-] MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago

Good one. I’ll respond with “enjoy your colostomy bag, you barbaric animal torturer”.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
763 points (94.7% liked)

me_irl

7283 readers
224 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS