▲ 513 ▼ Lawmakers Want to Ban VPNs—And They Have No Idea What They're Doing (www.eff.org) submitted 9 months ago by who@feddit.org to c/news@lemmy.world 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 months ago (1 child) If you throw money at the problem, you’d still have a VPN. Heavily depends on what "outlawed" means. I am certainly capable of implementing low cost workarounds to purely technical anti-VPN-measures, but certainly would not risk going to jail just for trying it. Essentially boils down to the old saying: "If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 child) The moment billionaires coopted the internet was when it went downhill. They knew the threat it posed, the vision of the early cypherpunks, and made sure the internet wouldn't do that to their power. Decentralization and accessibility are good things. Elitism and exclusionary practices do nothing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Very nuanced. Thank you for your thoughtful response! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 months ago (1 child) If you throw money at the problem, you’d still have a VPN. Heavily depends on what "outlawed" means. I am certainly capable of implementing low cost workarounds to purely technical anti-VPN-measures, but certainly would not risk going to jail just for trying it. Essentially boils down to the old saying: "If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 child) The moment billionaires coopted the internet was when it went downhill. They knew the threat it posed, the vision of the early cypherpunks, and made sure the internet wouldn't do that to their power. Decentralization and accessibility are good things. Elitism and exclusionary practices do nothing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Very nuanced. Thank you for your thoughtful response! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Very nuanced. Thank you for your thoughtful response! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Very nuanced. Thank you for your thoughtful response! permalink fedilink source parent