Oh yes because doing indiscriminate drone strikes was so effective in Iraq and Afghanistan. Drone strikes are precision strikes meaning they are generally better for taking out a core group of high value targets, but they'd be right fucking useless on a large scale function. There's a reason that the Navy more or less shutdown the drone program in WW2 that being that when the best way to deal with an enemy is to just to throw as much explosives as possible at a problem high capacity bombers are better, this general rule of thumb still reigns. You cant occupy and pacify an area with just drones because sooner or later folks will figure out counter measures, you can't really do that as easily when an army is bearing down on you.

Not to say drone strikes can't be effective when used in conjunction with traditional warfare, but we'll look at the war in Ukraine the Ruskies and Ukrainians keep figuring out new ways to jam each other's drones. It would probably only take a week at more for basic countermeasures to occur in the US, it could literally be shining a spotlight at the drone to fuck with it's camera depending on the model and the lights output.