1226
submitted 4 months ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Johnny101@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Google’s developer verification will only run on mainstream Android with play services. It’s not supposed won’t be running in standard AOSP so the easiest solution would be to switch to a custom ROM like GrapheneOS.

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 27 points 4 months ago

They are also working to similarly kill custom ROMs. Just recently the GrapheneOS team mentioned that Google is no longer making their hardware drivers Open Source, and so compatibility with new phones means reverse engineering their own drivers - which is a big reason that custom ROMs support such narrow hardware options already and very often come with limitations and/or features that just don't work. At best, they figure out how to make it work, but it takes time and updates can lag significantly behind.

We have a lot of options on the software side for avoiding google (or android), but very limited options on hardware. We need open source mobile hardware support ASAP.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 4 months ago

They’re not so much working to kill custom roms as they are just not giving away their code anymore, going closed source for their own hardware.

[-] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Why do you think they're making this arbitrary change?

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 4 months ago

Because Google have been wanting to be closed source for years, which is why nearly all their new features since they released the Pixel have been PixelOS exclusive and not in AOSP.

They don’t care about killing custom roms, that’s just a side effect of them going closed source for their Phone.

[-] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

What do you think the benefit of closing sourcing their software is if not to stifle competition?

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 4 months ago

It means they can do way more features without giving away precious IP, and it also just reduces their workload. They don’t need to keep giving out their code for free. It makes their job harder.

AOSP projects are not and never have been a threat to Google. They aren’t trying to stifle them - that’s just a byproduct of not giving away their code anymore. Giving it away gives literally zero benefits to them. It might only save them 0.01%, but that’s a lot money.

[-] rmrf@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

As someone whose job runs several FOSS projects, I think you're making up the fact that it adds meaningful workload.

I think that, for all intents and purposes, protecting IP is equivalent to stifling competition.

I think giving away code benefits the entire Android ecosystem, which might be the largest data mining operating Google has. I fully believe that's of nonzero benefit.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It doesn't have to be meaningful extra workload for it to cost them millions/billions of dollars because of their size.

[-] cosmo@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

While true, the pool of unlockable devices are dwindling fast.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

even the OP is softlocking thier newer phones(arbitrary online application to unlock it) in the near future, i expect a full lock sooner or later

[-] Johnny101@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

True…. I heard GrapheneOS is having trouble porting to the Pixel 10

[-] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 months ago

Also, aren’t some critical apps like banking apps starting to ban unlocked / non-stock systems? Heard someone complaining about this a while ago.

[-] Johnny101@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yes, banking apps, streaming apps, even some shopping apps. This has been a problem for a long time. Sometimes its for “security” reasons and sometimes its simply because the app uses Play Service APIs. Another issue on de-googled systems is push notifications, though that is often fixed through alternates like Unified Push

[-] coolkie@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

But remember, unlocking bootloader is harder and harder for many devices. And Google's Play Integrity and API changes makes removing trace of unlocked bootloader harder. Many apps not just banking, ChatGPT, games, some of social media is completely unusable in that scenario.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't have that choice in Denmark due to NemID.

[-] Johnny101@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Like other people have suggested, maybe get a second phone (one of those really cheap ones with play Services) and use that for that stuff, and keep your main personal phone google-free.

[-] ninjascum@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the way for me too

[-] bay400 1 points 4 months ago

At this point the solution seems to just be having a second phone for that kinda shit

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

I don't like that my neighbours are noisy, guess i should get a second house for when they're shouting

[-] bay400 2 points 4 months ago

ah yes because phones are $400,000-$1,000,000+

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I'm comparing the impracticality, not the monetary impact

[-] bay400 1 points 4 months ago

ah yes because those things are completely unrelated

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago
  • Carrying two massive slabs because a few apps won't run on one of them

  • Having a second home because some nights you can't sleep in one due to noisy neighbours

Where the more simple solution would be:

  • Have a phone that can run all of the apps you need so you don't need to buy and carry around a second phone
  • deal with your neighbours and sort stuff out rather than buy and travel to and from a second home.
[-] bay400 1 points 4 months ago

two massive slabs

bro what year are you living in? 1987?

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

No, I'm 2025 where a "small" phone is now 6x3"

[-] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You can just install Android. Only certified vendors will have the blocking activated.

[-] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

Well, fuck. Most of people use F-Droid on "certified vendors" device.

[-] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

If only. Most people I know have never heard of F-Droid... Only privacy-savvy people have.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1226 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

80859 readers
4798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS