this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
54 points (93.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

5614 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure why not? Add to the delicious medley of microplastics and persistent organic pollutants, what could go wrong!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  1. Contaminating food with semiconductors (especially food that's expected to be heated to very high temperatures in some dishes, perfect for breaking down already non-edible chemicals into even more reactive pollutants and then actively drawing them out of the semiconductor to where it's more readily absorbed by the intestines.) Look up some of the chemicals used to create the semiconductor effect in silicon. Arsenic is a really common one. It's locked away in the silicon crystal and harmless when outside your body, but inside your body when exposed to the heat of cooking and then strong acid in your stomach, who knows?!

  2. Making your own product worse to own the counterfeiters. One of the biggest reasons for avoiding counterfeit food is the higher risk of contaminants, well now that the genuine product is contaminated what's the goddamn point?

  3. Probably not preventing counterfeiters as in "they're selling a block of flour and passing it off as cheese", because you don't need a chip to detect that. More like "it didn't come from this very specific region in Italy by the established cheese monopoly, but it's pretty much identical otherwise." Protecting the brand and its profitability, not the consumer.

  4. Literal fucking food DRM. Remember when this used to be satire?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago