Sure that's a more substantive critique then this video presents. This video wreaks of terminally online smarmy "fell for it" energy. Do some people just enjoy laying in the grass waiting to pounce on subjects like this? Also, the first half of this video is strictly going after Welles appearance? Let's be real, this is a pretty poor delivery mechanism for the message.

I don't want to just be a shitter here, and I feel that I am doing that. What I'll say is, A) yeah the guy wants to make money B) Yeah he's a coward for putting out that weak ass kirk song C) his "message" (if he even has a coherent one) is still worth supporting if only because its like a foot in the door. You can use it as a means of bonding and relating to people who could be moved to the left of his perspective.

Developments like the popularity of Welles should be viewed as an opportunity. Instead it would seem some people would rather use these developments as a cudgel to bonk over the heads of people growing in class conciseness.