this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)
Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )
5662 readers
19 users here now
Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No piracy
Other Football/Soccer Related Communities
- Eredivisie
- MLS
- Football Manager
- Ajax FC
- Arsenal FC
- Chelsea FC
- Liverpool FC
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
- US National Woman’s Soccer League
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't think so, I believe it applies to any call where the decision is whether the handball was a penalty or not:
"An arm extended away from the body makes that body bigger, in an unnatural position," explains Mike Riley, Managing Director of Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the referees' body.
"If the ball strikes that arm, particularly if it is blocking a shot on goal, there is a greater likelihood we will penalise that."
So the way I see it, his right arm was in a natural postion, so no penalty.
source
then that's a terrible call, it blocks a shot on goal, arms is way up, by this logic there is no longer any need to tuck your hands in because that's unnatural so everything else is natural.
THey are trying to make rules more "fair" and shit but all they are achieving is shit subjective calls.