this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
237 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15910 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/2135509

this is practically a child’s view of the world. good guy vs bad guy. Russia = bad, NATO = good. plus, someone should tell her she has it completely backwards: ending russia is kinda natos entire thing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you can, that's why "progressive politics" are so limited

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No being progressive on domestic policy qndcs neocon on foreign policy is not and never will be progressive or on the left the reverse whould never be tolerated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look I'm not saying "progressive" is "good person", and I'm not interesting in claiming the label, let nato shills keep "progressive" and criticize "progressives" when they have to divert money from social issues to military expenditures

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I guess thst makes sense