▲ 895 ▼ Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 337 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wow, that's some intense double standards there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] rekabis@lemmy.ca -20 points 1 year ago (2 children) Wow, that's some intense double standards there. That’s an odd way of saying “ubiquitous female standards”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I know it’s a bit different, but there are cis women out there knowingly dating trans women who’ve likely had sex with men. So common yet, but I think ubiquitous isn’t accurate. Actually now that I’m thinking about it I knew a girl who hooked up with her gay guy best friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* I wasn’t commenting on this particular double standard anywhere as much as double standards in general; especially those which are almost exclusively one-way and “acceptable” for only women to hold. That a man trying to employ the same attitudes would be pilloried and castigated to the same degree that women would be lauded and supported. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. Mmm-hm. Attempts to socially shame me into silence and an ad hominem on top of that, but not a whisper of a viable rebuttal. That’s the problem with these censure attempts – always feelings over facts, instead of facts over feelings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rekabis@lemmy.ca -20 points 1 year ago (2 children) Wow, that's some intense double standards there. That’s an odd way of saying “ubiquitous female standards”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I know it’s a bit different, but there are cis women out there knowingly dating trans women who’ve likely had sex with men. So common yet, but I think ubiquitous isn’t accurate. Actually now that I’m thinking about it I knew a girl who hooked up with her gay guy best friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* I wasn’t commenting on this particular double standard anywhere as much as double standards in general; especially those which are almost exclusively one-way and “acceptable” for only women to hold. That a man trying to employ the same attitudes would be pilloried and castigated to the same degree that women would be lauded and supported. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. Mmm-hm. Attempts to socially shame me into silence and an ad hominem on top of that, but not a whisper of a viable rebuttal. That’s the problem with these censure attempts – always feelings over facts, instead of facts over feelings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I know it’s a bit different, but there are cis women out there knowingly dating trans women who’ve likely had sex with men. So common yet, but I think ubiquitous isn’t accurate. Actually now that I’m thinking about it I knew a girl who hooked up with her gay guy best friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* I wasn’t commenting on this particular double standard anywhere as much as double standards in general; especially those which are almost exclusively one-way and “acceptable” for only women to hold. That a man trying to employ the same attitudes would be pilloried and castigated to the same degree that women would be lauded and supported. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* I wasn’t commenting on this particular double standard anywhere as much as double standards in general; especially those which are almost exclusively one-way and “acceptable” for only women to hold. That a man trying to employ the same attitudes would be pilloried and castigated to the same degree that women would be lauded and supported. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. Mmm-hm. Attempts to socially shame me into silence and an ad hominem on top of that, but not a whisper of a viable rebuttal. That’s the problem with these censure attempts – always feelings over facts, instead of facts over feelings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) You've just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how "all women" act. You should get off the internet for a while. Mmm-hm. Attempts to socially shame me into silence and an ad hominem on top of that, but not a whisper of a viable rebuttal. That’s the problem with these censure attempts – always feelings over facts, instead of facts over feelings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago There is nothing you've said worthy of rebuttal. Ah - a sour grapes response! Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left. permalink fedilink source parent