Paywall removed https://archive.is/WGWDo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Should have shared the money with the workers who built the company into a $1.6B valuation and worth acquisition.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Jesus Christ, it's never good enough for you, why even bother trying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Just because he gave it away, doesn't remove his responsibility for how he "earned" it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If anything he should have invested it into effecting political change. But that other person is right; it's never good enough for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In Russia that's an oligarchy. Yet here you are advocating it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Oh, for fuck's sake.

    I'm not advocating for the system. I'm just suggesting a way the money could do the greatest good.

    Money can buy political change. That shouldn't be true, but it is.

    If you're so hungry for a target to be mad at that you imagine them like this, maybe it's time to take a little break.

  • source
  • parent