this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
176 points (87.6% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3417 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jacobin.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Neoliberal public universities" is such a Jacobin thing to say lol

This article is a mess, and the overarching point will remain stupid as long as college graduates continue to make vastly more money than non-grads.

They could've approached this from any sort of reasonable position, aimed at higher ed reform, loan reform, expansion of digital university access, etc and the direction they went was "neoliberal publicly-supported education" lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do they make vastly more? It’s not a guarantee. Plenty of folks out there with a degree in something they can’t service $120,000 in debt on with the salary it offers. These people would’ve been better off with a trade skill, or anything that pays minimum wage without the gargantuan debt.

I do generally agree with the point of the article. University’s have become exploitative. Not just to students, but also the army of underpaid adjuncts and grad students that keep things running while the schools spend on lavish buildings and admin salaries and grow their endowments.

I think you just have an ideological ax to grind with jacobin and maybe no real experience with student loan debt or the academic job market, which is blinding you to the truths it is highlighting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you get a college degree and don't make above median income it is 100% due to your own choices. I don't believe that many of those jobs should pay so little, especially with regard to shit like social work, teaching, and other publicly funded institutions, but a college degree is a gateway to wealth full stop.

I am pro-loan-forgiveness and believe public university attendance should be free, but it's undeniable that a college degree is currently worth the investment the vast majority of the time.

FWIW I have a degree in English/secondary education and was a teacher before I quit to make more money, which I will be forever angry about.

The system needing to change does not change reality.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, too broad. Good insight. Most people can’t even conceptualize neoliberal capitalism. Change the language, make it about personal issues. Talking dialectical materialism just glazes people’s eyes.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well also you immediately lose anyone who isnt an already-Jacobin-reading "socialist" so that's kind of not ideal.

As an actual neoliberal capitalist, I stop taking anyone seriously the moment they force "neoliberal" into shit that isn't remotely in an actual neoliberal's lexicon.

Like, even the most shitty, caricature-style neoliberals are into places like the Ivy League existing. They are all famously nonprofit. Normal people who align with neoliberalism, like me, are in fucking teachers unions and shit. We're the mainstream Democrat party, as Jacobin so often likes to remind everyone.

It's just such a lazy, irresponsible thing for an editor to allow through and an interviewer to not challenge. Fight against real shit.

I see myself as aligned with the general direction of the Jacobin on a lot of things - that's why I read the articles every time even if I'm constantly calling it a rag. It's a storied name and should produce better content.

I know being edgy is their whole thing but it's just so goddamn annoying.