▲ 1485 ▼ Thank you Tim Apple, who by the way is looking a little pudgy (sopuli.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by Gork@sopuli.xyz to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 155 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 168 points 1 year ago (1 child) Tim Apple supports a raping pedophile. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children) I know this isn't remotely the point but I think "pedophile rapist" hits better. Your way makes it sound like he is a rapist who is also a pedophile. Which, don't get me wrong, he is. But "pedophile rapist" describes the fact that he rapes children. Edit: I haven't had my coffee. 🤦♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children) Your way, a "pedophile rapist" makes it sound be rapes pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago* Sane people: "Trump is a pedophile rapist!" MAGA: "NO, he's a pedophile rapist!" permalink fedilink source parent [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) So a “French gourmand” is someone who is particular about the French people he eats? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Could be. The English language leaves lots of things to ambiguity. That's why context is so important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I mean, you'd have to be. French people are pretty stringy in general. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago It probably has to be pedophilic instead of pedophile to be correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Your term makes it sounds like he rapes pedophiles permalink fedilink source parent [–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago remove the fancy words, blunt works better imo child fucker permalink fedilink source parent [–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 year ago It's implied that if you're a pedophile you rape children, because they (legally) can't give consent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago I usually call him a rapist pedophile, but I think the best description is that he's a rapist and a pedophile. Monsters usually only have one kink but he's both. permalink fedilink source parent [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) "Child molester" is already a phrase that exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Molestation can be a bunch of creepy non legally defined ways. A person who has sex with a child, is a pedophile, or child rapist. (Not directed to you) but I keep seeing people wanting "child fucker" to catch on, but idk why it feels skeevy, almost feels like they are adding more ambiguity, as a child could be a child fucker, but they wouldn't be viewed as a pedophile. Where any grown adult who has sec with a child is a pedophile, it's well understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago No adult can "have sex" with a child, because rape is not the same thing as sex. Saying "have sex" implies consent, where no consent can be given. Same goes for "fucker" IMO. "Child rapist" would work fine if "molester" is too ambiguous for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children) I know this isn't remotely the point but I think "pedophile rapist" hits better. Your way makes it sound like he is a rapist who is also a pedophile. Which, don't get me wrong, he is. But "pedophile rapist" describes the fact that he rapes children. Edit: I haven't had my coffee. 🤦♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children) Your way, a "pedophile rapist" makes it sound be rapes pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago* Sane people: "Trump is a pedophile rapist!" MAGA: "NO, he's a pedophile rapist!" permalink fedilink source parent [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) So a “French gourmand” is someone who is particular about the French people he eats? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Could be. The English language leaves lots of things to ambiguity. That's why context is so important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I mean, you'd have to be. French people are pretty stringy in general. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago It probably has to be pedophilic instead of pedophile to be correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Your term makes it sounds like he rapes pedophiles permalink fedilink source parent [–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago remove the fancy words, blunt works better imo child fucker permalink fedilink source parent [–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 year ago It's implied that if you're a pedophile you rape children, because they (legally) can't give consent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago I usually call him a rapist pedophile, but I think the best description is that he's a rapist and a pedophile. Monsters usually only have one kink but he's both. permalink fedilink source parent [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) "Child molester" is already a phrase that exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Molestation can be a bunch of creepy non legally defined ways. A person who has sex with a child, is a pedophile, or child rapist. (Not directed to you) but I keep seeing people wanting "child fucker" to catch on, but idk why it feels skeevy, almost feels like they are adding more ambiguity, as a child could be a child fucker, but they wouldn't be viewed as a pedophile. Where any grown adult who has sec with a child is a pedophile, it's well understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago No adult can "have sex" with a child, because rape is not the same thing as sex. Saying "have sex" implies consent, where no consent can be given. Same goes for "fucker" IMO. "Child rapist" would work fine if "molester" is too ambiguous for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children) Your way, a "pedophile rapist" makes it sound be rapes pedophiles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago* Sane people: "Trump is a pedophile rapist!" MAGA: "NO, he's a pedophile rapist!" permalink fedilink source parent [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) So a “French gourmand” is someone who is particular about the French people he eats? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Could be. The English language leaves lots of things to ambiguity. That's why context is so important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I mean, you'd have to be. French people are pretty stringy in general. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago* Sane people: "Trump is a pedophile rapist!" MAGA: "NO, he's a pedophile rapist!" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) So a “French gourmand” is someone who is particular about the French people he eats? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Could be. The English language leaves lots of things to ambiguity. That's why context is so important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I mean, you'd have to be. French people are pretty stringy in general. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Could be. The English language leaves lots of things to ambiguity. That's why context is so important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) The context is “pedophile rapist”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's not how context works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The context here for pedophile rapist would be Donald Trump and his connections to Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I mean, you'd have to be. French people are pretty stringy in general. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago It probably has to be pedophilic instead of pedophile to be correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Your term makes it sounds like he rapes pedophiles permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago remove the fancy words, blunt works better imo child fucker permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 year ago It's implied that if you're a pedophile you rape children, because they (legally) can't give consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago I usually call him a rapist pedophile, but I think the best description is that he's a rapist and a pedophile. Monsters usually only have one kink but he's both. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) "Child molester" is already a phrase that exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Molestation can be a bunch of creepy non legally defined ways. A person who has sex with a child, is a pedophile, or child rapist. (Not directed to you) but I keep seeing people wanting "child fucker" to catch on, but idk why it feels skeevy, almost feels like they are adding more ambiguity, as a child could be a child fucker, but they wouldn't be viewed as a pedophile. Where any grown adult who has sec with a child is a pedophile, it's well understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago No adult can "have sex" with a child, because rape is not the same thing as sex. Saying "have sex" implies consent, where no consent can be given. Same goes for "fucker" IMO. "Child rapist" would work fine if "molester" is too ambiguous for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Molestation can be a bunch of creepy non legally defined ways. A person who has sex with a child, is a pedophile, or child rapist. (Not directed to you) but I keep seeing people wanting "child fucker" to catch on, but idk why it feels skeevy, almost feels like they are adding more ambiguity, as a child could be a child fucker, but they wouldn't be viewed as a pedophile. Where any grown adult who has sec with a child is a pedophile, it's well understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago No adult can "have sex" with a child, because rape is not the same thing as sex. Saying "have sex" implies consent, where no consent can be given. Same goes for "fucker" IMO. "Child rapist" would work fine if "molester" is too ambiguous for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago No adult can "have sex" with a child, because rape is not the same thing as sex. Saying "have sex" implies consent, where no consent can be given. Same goes for "fucker" IMO. "Child rapist" would work fine if "molester" is too ambiguous for you. permalink fedilink source parent