you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Non-profit isn't the same as not-for-profit

Take American Red Cross

They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This smells like BS.

    Is mozilla non-profit, not-for-profit, or for-profit?

    You dont really know do you.

    "I dont like mozilla so ill just assume they must be profiteering assholes somehow"

    "Its the vibe of the thing"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I only use Firefox. I've only used Firefox since 2000.

    They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

    Sit down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You seem to be able to google "mozilla non profit" but unable to elucidate whether it is in fact a non-profit and why that is so.

    Again, you're offering hand wavy vibe based explanations as to why mozilla is "bad". What exactly is the problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I have worked for non-profits.

    They are completely allowed to make a profit.

    You are mistakenly under the impression that I'm against Mozilla.

    If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

    You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.

    Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?

  • source
  • parent