34
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

From my perspective stocks are a huge scam.

I watched a documentary on Bernie Madoff last year and never figured out what the bad thing was that he did. Like yes obviously it's bad when people lose their life savings, but why was it illegal the way Madoff did it and not illegal when it's someone else? Who chooses when it's a Ponzi scheme and when it's the invisible hand of the market? For that matter, when is a bank a legitimate bank and not a ponzi scheme?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

slightly related, but the big flag that the stock market is just a casino is that using the best strategy to "win" (insider trading) is illegal

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Illegal but only sparingly enforced.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Do you mean actually or for the westoids?

In capitalism, a scam is when a poor person does it. If a rich person does it, thats called innovative strategy. (Not joking)

In my opinion as a clerk, banks are always scams. Why the fuck would someone want to store their money somewhere in the first place except for electronic transfer (which also is a scam in its implementation).

There was the concept of cheques. If you hand someone a cheque you better make sure the money is there when the person liquidates the cheque. Honestly, cash would have been better and more honest.

Anyway, I think it will all get better when we implement council governance and decapitate the capitalist systems.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I mean actually. But sometimes hearing westoid cope is also fun, cause they'd come to the same questions if they just thought for a minute.

In capitalism, a scam is when a poor person does it.

That's the weird thing about the Madoff example. He wasn't poor, and was very well respected on Wall Street.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That’s the weird thing about the Madoff example. He wasn’t poor, and was very well respected on Wall Street.

It's always the same mechanic. If a rich person gets persecuted, it is because the system needs to appear legit. Or they are trying to suppress something else. Today I learned the term "boomer truth regime" which I will be trying to further research since it sounds pretty much like the issue a lot of us are facing atm.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I hadn't heard the phrase "boomer truth regime" before you mentioned it and I was curious as well. Turns out it's when cryptofacists try to explain the US cultural shifts from WWII to today while using fancy terms they don't understand (and obviously no dialectics nor theory of class or political economy). It's definitely a laugh to read about though, there's a bit of possibly every classic far-right conspiracy theory in there.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I was very sad when I read about it and it turned out to be fascist shit. The term is pretty cool though. I thought they meant the revisionism but it turns out they were wildly off. Because I havent yet gotten my hands on good literature on the topic of western history revisionism and the sheer tons of lies they spread. Its a problem because it is true but the fascists again are more visible.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1167 readers
59 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS