you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn't a bad thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    i'd say it's still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Presumably it wasn't instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    it's still not fine, as per my first point. it's leaking information to foreign interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments