you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

of course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn't a bad thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    i'd say it's still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Presumably it wasn't instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    it's still not fine, as per my first point. it's leaking information to foreign interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments