-67
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

No, I do not care about "traditional family values", I care about the commodification of bodily autonomy. "Traditional family values" as this author alludes to have never protected those, especially not for women and girls. This just happens to be the first place I heard about this, since most left publications have chosen to abdicate their role in reporting on such things (such as the UN deciding that we need laws to protect pimping + actively encourage prostitution + refer to child sex slaves as "sexual child labor" or whatever (I do not need to elaborate on what needs to be done about such people, presumably?)).

The main argument being made here is "porn make taxes and GDP go up" which you should be familiar with by now. Generally these kinds of laws are used to create legal protection for pimping.

This is not auspicious news

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

the UN is arguing that because prostitution exists, there should be legal protections for pimps and a reclassification of child rape victims as "workers*.

Citation needed.

You keep mixing porn and prostitution. Maybe keep your messaging straight so other people can follow? Because I still don't know what your argument here is other than "I DONT LIKE IT".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

just look at their profile. 220 posts and 180 comments in 2 months. isn't it suspicious?

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
-67 points (13.2% liked)

World News

36921 readers
481 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS