171
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

And? He's not a standard Democrat. This fickle purity testing is why the right keeps winning.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

What the fuck is "purity testing"?

I'm complaining about him hiring Lerner. He's playing by standard DNC rules, at best now.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

What the fuck is “purity testing”?

It's what centrists say when people to their left have standards.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

He's run a phenomenally lowercase-d democratic and candid campaign. Hiring one experienced DNC Communications chair does not compromise his platform. It might lead to that, but it might not. To judge based purely on that appointment, before anything has actually happened, is 100% purity testing.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 18 hours ago

So losing faith that a candidate is going to stick by his word is now something called "purity testing"?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago

Your faith is your business. Barking the failings of the lesser evil, in the wave of greater evil, with no good strong enough to replace them. Yeah, that's purity testing.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

The lesser evil keeps getting more evil.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
171 points (98.3% liked)

Progressive Politics

2979 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS