28
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Unite has announced it has suspended Angela Rayner from her membership of the union, in an escalating row over the long-running bin strikes in Birmingham.

The deputy prime minister has been urging striking bin workers to accept a deal to end the dispute tabled by the Labour-run city council.

In an emergency motion at its conference in Brighton, the union said it would also re-examine its relationship with Labour if the council makes any of its members redundant.
[…]
A spokesperson for Rayner said she is no longer a member of the union - although Unite is insisting that she is on its membership system.

Unite is affiliated to Labour, and is the party's biggest union funder.

It did not donate to the party's election campaign last year, but made donations worth £10,000 towards Rayner's campaign, according to her register of interests.

Members of the union walked out in January over plans to downgrade some roles as part of the city council's attempts to sort out its equal pay liabilities.

An all-out indefinite strike was announced in March, and a deal to end industrial action has not yet been reached.

They also suspended Birmingham Council leader John Cotton.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Please read people's comments before deciding for them what their position is and demonising them for what you decide they are saying.

manny has not said anyone is wrong never mind "both sides" and their point is a fair one. Personally given an industrial dispute I am heavily baised towards beliving the union is more likely to be in the right that the employer. In this case however the employer is local government who are essentially out of money due to the cuts imposed on them by austerity over the past 15 years. Further than that I dont know the details so I cant say if these strikes are justified or not, but asking who is in the right is not heresy that must be cleansed from discourse.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ironic that you would say that since you didn't actually bother to interpret my comment.

I have no problem with understanding both sides of the arguement. As you say it's an important thing to do, but that wasn't what happened with this comment. What happened with this comment was virtue signalling, they actually bother to understand both sides of the argument they just said that they had with no understanding of the situation.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

No, you were quite literally projecting that, they asked if the government position was wrong. You are assuming bad faith and it's poor behaviour.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4015 readers
141 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS