▲ 423 ▼ Jon Stewart Tears Apart Dems’ ‘Idiotic’ Project 2029 Plan (www.thedailybeast.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments Paywall removed https://archive.is/UnSQN
[+] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -11 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Yeah you can say that to suit your narrative, but it’s complete BS. In fact Corbyn had significantly more votes in 2017 and 2019 than Starmer in 2024. Which governments did Labour form at the time, again? The left has to convince voters, not follow them, wtf Electoral success and convincing people are not mutually exclusive options; the former is an immensely powerful tool for the latter. Unless your plan is "Hand the gun over to the fascists, put it to your head, and hope that when they pull the trigger it will inspire the masses to spontaneously learn the words to the Internationale in their hearts and rise up against fascism", it involves some amount of concessions to the majority of voters. But sure, run on gay marriage in 1940 until you win, I'm sure the Black folk who are being lynched won't mind waiting another few decades, nor will the unions seeking better conditions, nor the folks trying to stop social security from being repealed etc etc etc etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right They subsequently elected Starmer, of all people, didn't they? This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism. I'm sorry, if Corbyn didn't form a government, as majority or coalition partner, didn't move politics in the UK left, nor politics in his own party left, nor moved demographics in the UK left... what kind of success are we looking at, here? For the record, I'm not blaming Corbyn for this loss. Far from it. I'm only saying that going left is not enough permalink fedilink source parent
[+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -11 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Yeah you can say that to suit your narrative, but it’s complete BS. In fact Corbyn had significantly more votes in 2017 and 2019 than Starmer in 2024. Which governments did Labour form at the time, again? The left has to convince voters, not follow them, wtf Electoral success and convincing people are not mutually exclusive options; the former is an immensely powerful tool for the latter. Unless your plan is "Hand the gun over to the fascists, put it to your head, and hope that when they pull the trigger it will inspire the masses to spontaneously learn the words to the Internationale in their hearts and rise up against fascism", it involves some amount of concessions to the majority of voters. But sure, run on gay marriage in 1940 until you win, I'm sure the Black folk who are being lynched won't mind waiting another few decades, nor will the unions seeking better conditions, nor the folks trying to stop social security from being repealed etc etc etc etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right They subsequently elected Starmer, of all people, didn't they? This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism. I'm sorry, if Corbyn didn't form a government, as majority or coalition partner, didn't move politics in the UK left, nor politics in his own party left, nor moved demographics in the UK left... what kind of success are we looking at, here? For the record, I'm not blaming Corbyn for this loss. Far from it. I'm only saying that going left is not enough permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right They subsequently elected Starmer, of all people, didn't they? This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism. I'm sorry, if Corbyn didn't form a government, as majority or coalition partner, didn't move politics in the UK left, nor politics in his own party left, nor moved demographics in the UK left... what kind of success are we looking at, here? For the record, I'm not blaming Corbyn for this loss. Far from it. I'm only saying that going left is not enough permalink fedilink source parent
[+] PugJesus@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right They subsequently elected Starmer, of all people, didn't they? This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism. I'm sorry, if Corbyn didn't form a government, as majority or coalition partner, didn't move politics in the UK left, nor politics in his own party left, nor moved demographics in the UK left... what kind of success are we looking at, here? For the record, I'm not blaming Corbyn for this loss. Far from it. I'm only saying that going left is not enough permalink fedilink source parent