421
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Paywall removed https://archive.is/UnSQN

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago

They’re not idiotic, they have to pretend to do something opposing the Republicans while they help them transfer all the wealth to the rich and start imperial wars around the world, otherwise normal people might catch on and do something about it.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

This is it exactly. The Democrats are not on your side. They're neoliberals. They believe in the freedom of money. They are a party for rich people. This isn't a battle between left and right. It's a battle between rich and poor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 67 points 4 days ago

I am listening to this episode right now. He's spot on. These idiot libs seem to want another loss.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 4 days ago

Jon Stewart is not impressed with the Democratic Party’s plan to craft a Project 2029, which he said will just be a “a rehash of all the consultant driven, careful nonsense” that caused them to lose the presidency to Donald Trump.

It's not the party doing this...

It's the neoliberals that were run out of the DNC creating their own club and hoping progressives fall for the bait and fight to be included in a place they have no power and will be ignored.

Don't take the bait. Let them hold their own meaningless meetings about what the least they can do would be.

Stewart was pretty specific about who/what he was complaining about, but articles are missing the details and all of them seem desperate to turn people off from the new and I proved DNC now that neoliberals don't control it.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago

This is the first I've heard of the neoliberals being driven out of the DNC and frankly I find it a bit hard to believe. Outside of the win in NY I haven't heard of any other significant shakeups in the party, and frankly the number of politicians in the DNC you'd need to oust to dislodge the neoliberals makes me think I'd have heard something.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The DNC is definitively a neoliberal party. Obama was one of the most neoliberal presidents we have ever had, as far as social attitudes go. He massively carried water for the whole “if I made it, anyone can” and “black people suffer from a culture of poverty” type of nonsense, both of which serve an agenda that is against providing social safety nets and actually helping people improve their lives. Neoliberalism is all about blaming individuals for the failures of government as a means to avoid bolstering social services

“Neoliberals have been run out of the DNC” is absolutely nonsense. Neoliberals running the DNC is 99.9% of the problem with the DNC today. Its the reason why true progressive politics fail so often

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

From the perspective of current power the Neoliberals are the DNC.

It is only some grassroots movements in the party that try to change that.They are just at the start and the DNC is fiercly fighting them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

“Their project 2029 is going to be a rehash of all the consultant-driven, careful nonsense that has put them in this place… in a moment when the Republican Congress is passing one of the most devastating bills that we have seen in this country in forever,” he said.

Was project 2025 consultant-driven?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

I think Jon was referring to the previous DNC strategies, which were heavily reliant on consultants.

As for P.2025, that was written by the Heritage Foundation, with chapters written by various groups and individuals paid to help craft the document. So, yeah, sorta, but not in the way the DNC does it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Is it time yet to consider a 3rd party?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

That gives "dad are you coming to pick me up from baseball practice" vibes.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

This guy got $866,425 from AIPAC in the previous 2 years.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
421 points (97.9% liked)

politics

24755 readers
2769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS