184
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)
science
20271 readers
267 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ok, if you won't do it, I will: The US has 1,889,780 researchers, with old data and rough math, we'll just round that to 2M. We'll rough-in 30 for "a few dozen", giving us a ratio of 3/200,000 or 0.000015 or 0.0015%. I'll be generous and round up to 0.002%. Far less than one one-hundredth of a percent of researchers is worth establishing an official, named, racist government program? And what did we gain? The knowledge that poor Chinese people will stay poor and undoubtedly get poorer? The ire and distrust of an entire demigraphic of citizens and residents in our own country? More opportunities for white men? A few extra pennies in the pockets of billionaires? Yay, yippee, woohoo, another wonderfully beneficial use of taxpayer dollars from the party of small government. ๐๐๐
And given what we're seeing with the current federal ~~hate~~race-based law enforcement programs, we have absolutely no reason to believe those few dozen convicted researchers were actually even guilty of anything. I honestly wouldn't even be surprised if they're not all Chinese. But I'm sure the bigots met their quota, so that's really all that matters. ๐