2219
Save The Planet (lazysoci.al)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Do you have any data to support this is actually the case? I see this all the time but absolutely zero evidence but a 2015 Axios survey with no methodology or dataset. Nearly every article cites this one industry group with 3 questions that clearly aren't exclusive categorical and could be picked apart by a high school student.

I ask this question nearly every time I see this comment and in 5 years I have not found a single person who can actually cite where this came from or a complete explanation of even hope they got to that conclusion.

The truck owners I know, myself included, use them all the time for towing and like the added utility having the bed as as secondary feature.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The truck owners I know, myself included, use them all the time for towing and like the added utility having the bed as as secondary feature.

    Then you put it beside a truck from 30 years ago that's a quarter the overall size but has the same bed capacity and towing power along with much better visibility instead of not being able to see the child you're about to run over. And then you understand what people mean when they say massive trucks - giant ridiculously unnecessary things that are all about being a status symbol and dodging regulations rather than practicality.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely 100% incorrect on towing. The 95 top f150 towed about 7700 compared to 13500 today. That's an f350 in 95. It'll also fit a family of 4 comparable to a full size sedan eliminating any need of a secondary vehicle. The old f150/1500s were miserable in the back.

    As for the safety I find the argument disingenuous not based on reality. Roughly 160 kids were killed in 23 with the EU27. It was 220 in the US. Much of that could be correlated to traffic density as well.

    Country / Region Est. Fatalities/Year Child Pop. (0–14) Fatalities per Million

    United States ~225 ~61 million ~3.7 United Kingdom ~22 ~11.5 million ~1.9 Canada ~12 ~6 million ~2.0 Australia ~11 ~4.8 million ~2.3 Germany ~20 ~11 million ~1.8 France ~18 ~11 million ~1.6 Japan ~18 ~15 million ~1.2 India ~3,000 (est.) ~360 million ~8.3 Brazil ~450 ~50 million ~9.0 European Union (EU-27) ~140–160 ~72 million ~2.0–2.2

    I think we should offer incentives for manufacturers to start reducing size and weight, but things you are saying here aren't really based off of any data nor was it what I was asking.

    I just wish I could find one person to show me what they are referencing when they repeat that seemingly false fact.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Let me express it to you with some numbers... The US is ~3.81 million square miles in size.

    The F150 has sold 8.810 million units in the US in the last 10 years.

    There are ~ 2.3 F150s fewer than 10 years old for every square mile in this country.

    There is no way the majority of those trucks are going to job sites, or hauling junk, or pulling a trailer, just look around. That's not even all trucks. Thats just one model, from one brand, for a single 10 yr period.

    These trucks are primarily sold as a vanity vehicle, and a minivan alternative, and that's what I think when I see one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •