1591
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That would have made slightly more sense...

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is state power being used to murder undesirables.

That’s fascism. Terrorism would be non state actors

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Didn't know that, thanks for the info and thanks to the person who posted that other article.

My confusion with the OCommenter was due to that.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That's not true... the term "terrorism" was originally used to describe the actions of states - it's only due to the media that, for rather obvious reasons, states have been "absolved" from the vastly greater levels of terrorism they commit in contrast to the comparatively minor levels committed by non-state actors.

So yes, this is terrorism. I't s not "eco-terrorism" (which is mostly a non-issue invented by the media) - it's bog-standard, common-or-garden-variety fascist terrorism. The kind the media goes out of it's way to never call terrorism.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Nope. It wouldn't.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1591 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

50992 readers
1097 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS