901
Teleportation problem (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Was it though? I'd argue it was disassembled. And a pen wouldn't stop being the same pen if you disassemble it, take the pieces somewhere else, and assemble it again. This is the same but at an atomic level.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Nope. If it makes a perfect copy of you during transport ... you die during the transport.

    If you come through with a transporter clone your original mind doesn't inhabit both of them ... so your original mind will not inhabit either of them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What is your "original mind" though? Is there such a thing? Are you the same you you were last night? You only "Inhabit yourself" in the present, so the continuity of your mind is just an illusion. For the clone, they would be as "you" as you are, and in fact it would be impossible to tell the difference between you and your clone for anyone, including yourself. Maybe you're the clone?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    There is an easy logic test to see if a person's "mind" is really in a clone/copy/backup. If the original and the copy exist at the same time would the original perceive itself in two places? If not, then that "exact copy" method doesn't work ... the original just dies and a near copy is made. Someone mentioned the zombie theory earlier in the post ... just about as creepy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's stupid, of course you don't have access to the brain of a different “you”. The moment you get forked into two, there's now two separate beings.

    But none have more claim to be the original than the other, since your continuous experience of reality is only an illusion anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why would the "original" be able to perceive itself in two places? Are you able to perceive yourself in the past? That was literally you, yet you only perceive the present. There is no reason why you should be able to perceive a brain identical to yours but separated in space either.

    Also the point is the "original" doesn't make sense in the first place, both the copy and you would perceive the same thing in your hypothetical case, because you are the same.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    No, I perceive the past. It is just not editable.

    You miss the point. I'm saying you could never be in two bodies at once ... thus when a copy is made (transporter, cloning, transfer to a digital backup program,etc) ... the original dies. The copy is not the original ... unless logic dictates that a mind can be in two bodies at once ... which it does not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent