you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (37 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (23 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section

    I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    So Wikipedia is what convinced you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.

    What do you want more?

    Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    We got it. They're avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Sorry, my autocorrect failed me. I corrected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I think he is a paid troll but no need to be insulting or hurting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I’m not insulting 🤔 just joking with the fact that French speakers and English don’t really go well together

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Ok. They'd fail you for that in highschool

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    For sure, that’s why I passed then.

    Stop talking nonsense please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You used Wikipedia as a source and passed?

    Standards sure have dropped

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    One of the sources, or just get the sources quoted in wikipedia and use them. Ofc you're supposed to check on multiple sources, but using wikipedia isn't bad.

    Not sure what you have against it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Good god, I knew education standards had dropped but didn't realise they'd dropped that much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Why do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    Why do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Because you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don't play dumb

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Ho I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    If that was true you wouldn't keep replying. You know I'm not, you're just using it as a personal attack

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Lol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did that even make sense in your head?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    It does if not I wouldn't do it :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments