170
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
170 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
10243 readers
523 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Emphasis mine. Genuinely curious how many more there are and what they're waiting for.
While I obviously would like to hope that there's a bunch more down there, I have a hard time seeing a situation where it would be preferable to alert your enemy to their presence rather than detonate them all at once.
I rather think he's alluding to the possibility that there are more to make russians spend more resources looking or alluding to that this can/will happen again.
Does Russia have the ability or even surviving men with the skill to remove them?
I wish they didn't, but they most likely do.
The statistics from the past 1-1.5 years has shown that russia has done a decent job at protecting the most experienced/specialised soldiers, while using fresh, unspecialised troops for the meat waves.
If they have eyes on it, attack it when it's being repaired is all I can come up with, but given their emphasis on no civilian casualties that might not line up properly.