82
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster

then just this once our interests align, because that probably lowers the chance of a Kessler Syndrome scenario, which was always my main concern in relation to this satellite swarm bullshit

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're in way too low an orbit to pose a Kessler threat since any debris would fall back down on a scale of a few months to under a decade. The danger comes from stuff that's at decade-to-century lifetimes.

Starlink sucks for a bunch of other reasons like the huge rocket emissions to put a bunch of astronomy-polluting garbage in space that's designed to fail.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

They also have massively increased the level of aluminum oxide in the atmosphere from all the satellites burning up (something like a 30% increase over baseline), which might damage the ozone layer.

Apparently half of all active satellites are Starlink and they plan to increase the current number by ~8x.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

holy shit, I knew it was bad but not that bad

this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23784 readers
135 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS